GetAmbITion

Get AmbITion! Communicate, collaborate, create and celebrate getting digital in the arts.

  1. Designing Better Festivals – Festivalslab service design toolkit launch talks

    And don’t forget – the service design toolkit with guides, examples, handouts and other practical and handy tools is available at http://design.festivalslab.com

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    filter
    box
  2. Digital arts and the imagination by Rachel Coldicutt

    (Thanks to @rachelcoldicutt for giving us permission to re-publish this article, which originally appeared as an inspiration essay for Arts Council England & BBC’s launch of The Space – an experimental digital arts media service and commissioning programme that could help to transform the way people connect with, and experience, arts and culture).

    Making things for screens can be tricky.

    There’s something both ephemeral and infinite-seeming about digital projects that makes people nervous. At inception, these projects can seem capable of not just carrying our hopes and dreams, but also delivering our marketing targets, reaching the otherwise inaccessible and generating some incremental income on the side. If we’re lucky, our favourite digital project might also increase our search-engine ranking and tip us over a million ‘likes’ on Facebook. While also, of course, saying something trenchant about art.

    Or that, at least, is how it can feel in meetings, when budgets are tight and priorities conflicted. It can seem as if a glittering digital project can save us all, while also showing that we’re modern and looking for new audiences.

    Generally, digital projects that try to fulfil entire organisational strategies are doomed to failure. And I should know, I’ve worked on a few. But luckily, I’ve also worked on some that have done very well – and between those extremes a few principles have emerged:

    – The most important platform is the imagination
    – Try to do one thing as well as you can
    – Innovate judiciously
    – Not everything in the world needs to be filmed

    And – of course:
    – If it feels right, ignore all of the above

    1. The most important platform is the imagination
    Whether you’re making a film, an e-book, a website, an app or a game, the most important platform is the one between your audience members’ ears. It’s the one that can give your product a life of its own, but it’s also the most difficult one to make something for.

    Digital projects that don’t leave space for the imagination tend to script every outcome, predict every reaction. As an audience member, you can’t fall in love with them because they’re already in love with themselves.

    I’ve often been asked whether projects I’ve worked on have been ’art’ or ’marketing’, and I haven’t known. But I realise the difference is that an art project tends to invite the imagination in, while a marketing one will try to determine the outcomes – do the imaginative work so the audience doesn’t have to. But determining the outcomes can mean there’s no space left for the audience – which makes it less likely to become either virally popular or personally cherished.

    2. Do one thing very well
    Audiences seem to like this – or at least, they prefer it to ‘doing quite a few things badly’. It’s easier to take people on a journey if they think they know roughly the direction they’re going in. So, if you’re making a game, it doesn’t hurt to make it fun. If you’re making a film, make it as interesting as it can be and get the sound right! If you’re showing something beautiful, let it look as good as it possibly can. Adding additional media, calls to action, social networks and GPS mapping is the digital equivalent of Cubism – only start doing it when you really know how to paint, otherwise your audience will be confused.

    And too many distractions will detract from the imagination. Keeping it simple will make your audience love it more.

    3. Innovate judiciously
    By which I mean, innovate as much as you like, but don’t try and build everything from scratch, just for yourself. The ocean bed of the web is littered with tools that are waiting to become vessels for your content. Bring your organisations uniqueness, its stories, its assets, its talent, to those tools and show how much better it is than everything else out there. The Space is a new platform that brings together web and broadcast elements and will let you experiment without having to build it yourself, so try to use what’s on offer.

    4. Not everything in the world needs to be filmed
    It just doesn’t. Particularly if it’s an event at which no microphones will be available. Or if it’s a critic or other expert sitting alone in a room commenting on something they didn’t create. If it’s not interesting enough for someone to read, it definitely won’t be interesting enough to watch as a video.

    I’ve learned this the hard way. Bearing it in mind will not only save you thousands of pounds, it will free up your time to make more interesting things.

    5. If it feels right, ignore all of the above
    Except the first one. Never ignore the first one.

    Examples
    In case this seems a little abstract and esoteric, I’m going to finish with some examples of beautiful things that I think let the imagination in. Some may appear over-simple, but they have all been made with enormous skill and great respect for both the audience and the art they represent. Each has a timeless quality that lets the audience fall in love – and once the audience is in love, you can start taking all kinds of liberties.

    Audio Slideshows: ‘Dick Bruna: Miffy and me – audio slideshow’, guardian.co.uk

    Jan Pienkowski: drawing Meg and Mog – audio slideshow’, guardian.co.uk

    Film: Edward Burra, Balfour Films for the Arts Council (via Pallant House Gallery)

    Ebook: The Heart and the Bottle, Olive Jeffers and Bold Creative

    Game: Papa Sangre, Agency of Coney and Somethin’ Else

    Film: Mark Titchner Studio Tour, Tate Shots/Jared Schiller

    Film: Lauren Cuthbertson: High Pointe, Royal Opera House

    Rachel Coldicutt blogs at fabricofthings.wordpress.com

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    filter
    box
  3. Watch! Digital Fundraising Webinar, 18.11.2011

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    filter
    box
  4. Designing Better Festivals 07.12.2011

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    filter
    box
  5. “To @byleaveswelive…” AmbITion organisation Scottish Poetry Library & other Edinburgh literary organisations receive mystery sculptures

    by Hannah Rudman

    Categories

    By Dayle Sheward, from Dayle.me

    It started suddenly. Without warning.

    Last spring, Julie Johnstone, a librarian at the Scottish Poetry Library in Edinburgh, was wandering through a reading room when she saw, sitting alone on a random table, a little tree.

    It was made of twisted paper and was mounted on a book.

    Gorgeously crafted, it came with a gold-leafed eggshell broken in two, each half filled with little strips of paper with phrases on them. When reassembled properly, the strips became a poem about birds, “A Trace of Wings” by Edwin Morgan.

    What was this?

    sculpture 2

    Chris Scott/flickr

    “This is for you in support of libraries, books, words, ideas…” said a note, addressed to the Library by its twitter name “@ByLeavesWeLive”. There was no artist signature, no one to thank. The staff, totally nonplussed, asked on their blog if anybody knew who made it. They described the gift as a “poetree” and waited. Nobody claimed authorship.

    Then, it happened again

    This time, a coffin, topped by a large gramophone showed up suddenly at The National Library of Scotland. The scene was carved from a book, a mystery novel by Ian Rankin, one of Britain’s bestselling crime writers. It seemed like a visual pun, because the book’s title was Exit Music.

    sculpture 3

    Chris Scott/flickr

    Once again, a note said, “A gift in support of libraries, books, words, ideas…(& against their exit).”

    Next came a movie theater, one of Edinburgh’s local art film houses. It got, out of nowhere, a book carved so that a bunch of warriors seemed to be leaping (or in some cases galloping) off a movie screen straight into a startled audience. One of the audience members, if you looked closely, was wearing a tiny photo of the face of mystery writer Ian Rankin. The mystery deepened.

    sculpture 4
    Chris Scott/flickr
    sculpture 5

    Chris Scott/flickr

    Was this Rankin’s doing? His Scottish detective character, named Rebus, has been adapted for television. Perhaps the TV people were trying to gin up some publicity? A new form of viral marketing, maybe? No, said Rankin. He told the Edinburgh papers he had no idea who made these little books and he had nothing to do with it.

    Next (and by now we’ve moved from spring into summer) somebody found a little dragon peeking out of an egg in a windowsill at The Scottish Storytelling Centre. This dragon was carved, once again, from an Ian Rankin mystery and came with the same anonymous tag:

    A gift in support of libraries, books, works, ideas… Once upon a time there was a book and in the book was a nest and in the nest was an egg and in the egg was a dragon and in the dragon was a story…

    sculpture 6

    Chris Scott/flickr

    Then, the pace quickened. On a single day in August, two new sculptures showed up at the Edinburgh International Book festival, one at the Bookshop, the other at something called the UNESCO Edinburgh City of Literature. Whoever brought them in, got out unnoticed.

    sculpture 7
    Chris Scott/flickr
    sculpture 8

    Chris Scott/flickr

    By this fall, these mysterious sculptures had become a hot story. Reporters checked the newest teacup and cupcake, then the little fellow hiding in a forest for some sign of authorship, and once again found a connection to mystery writer Ian Rankin. The hiding man was nestled in a book Rankin had publicly admired.

    Mr. Rankin came to the festival, checked out the new sculpture. Here he is, trying to look innocent. The thing is: he probably is innocent.

    sculpture 9

    Chris Scott/flickr

    Because within a week or two, another sculpture, this one a large magnifying glass, something Sherlock Holmes might have used but in paper form, appeared at the Central Lending Library. It was balanced precariously on a book.

    sculpture 10

    Chris Scott/flickr

    This sculpture had no known connection to Mr. Rankin, but it did quote from poet Edward Morgan — whose poem inspired the first sculpture. Hmmm. First Morgan, then Rankin, then Morgan again — who is the real perpetrator, asked the BBC, Scotland TV, The Guardian. And what is he? She? They? trying to tell us? Everyone wanted to know.

    Just as the news cycle was about to hit boil, The Edinburgh Evening News announced it had cracked the case. It turns out, they said, their own former music librarian, a Mr. Garry Gale, had figured it out. Mr. Gale said when he saw the sculptures he realized they looked exactly like a paper sculpture he had bought a year or so earlier from a certain artist that he didn’t name, but the styles were so unerringly similar it had to be the same artist who was dropping these little gifts on major cultural centers in Edinburgh.

    Who Did It?

    So, OK! Now we find out who did it.

    Well, this is where my reporting either falls short or I bump into the respectful quiet that is Edinburgh culture. Instead of having Mr. Gale immediately identify the perpetrator, the Evening News decided to take a poll: Do you really want to know, it asked its readers, who made these gorgeous teacups and dragons and magnifying glasses, or would you rather honor the artist, and let him/her remain anonymous?

    Can you even imagine such a thing in America? Can you imagine People magazine or the New York Daily News saying “Shall we protect this shy fellow’s privacy?” Shall we honor his modesty?

    The readers wrote in. And according to Central Station, a Scottish website, “the general view is that We Don’t Want To Know.” Presumably a significant number of respondents said they would rather not learn the identity of the sculptor and it would be best if those who know just not tell.

    Has the paper published the perpetrator’s name?

    It hasn’t. At least, I can’t find any mention on their site. I found possible culprits mentioned, but no authoritative story. Several pages, it seems, have been un-cached and can’t be read. Unbelievably (to me) that’s how the story ends.

    [thanks npr.org]

    By Dayle Sheward, from Dayle.me

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    filter
    box
Creative Scotland Lottery Fund Culture Sparks Rudman Consulting Arts Council England